Skip to main content

Compliance, Governance and Incident Response

Learn how SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS map to your pipelines, automate audit evidence, and run security incidents from detection to postmortem.

~3 hours
10 Topics
Hands-on Scenarios

What You'll Learn

Understanding Why Compliance Breaks Engineering Teams

Compliance rarely fails because a control is missing. It fails because nobody can prove the control worked.

Understanding SOC 2, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS Without the Jargon

Each framework asks a different question, and knowing which one a customer is really asking saves months of work.

Mapping One Control to Several Frameworks

Implement a control once, log it once, and let that single record answer every framework that asks.

Enforcing Policy as Code in Pipelines and Clusters

Policies that run on every change stop violations early, and every run is a dated record for the auditor.

Monitoring Compliance Continuously

Pipeline checks catch what is new. Continuous monitoring catches what changed afterwards, such as a bucket opened by hand at 11 PM.

Collecting Audit Evidence Automatically

Evidence you must gather by hand before an audit is evidence you will miss. Evidence produced on every run is already there.

Skills You'll Master

COMPLIANCESOC2ISO27001COMPLIANCE-AS-CODEINCIDENT-RESPONSE

Curriculum Index10 topics

Career Impact

Roles that use the skills in this module.

  • DevSecOps Engineer

    ₹22L - ₹45L a year

    High Demand
  • Security Engineer

    ₹20L - ₹40L a year

    High Demand
  • SRE

    ₹18L - ₹38L a year

    High Demand
See how this is asked in interviews

Practice on the Coding Sheet

Not a software engineer sheet. Every problem comes from real DevOps, SRE, Platform and Cloud interviews, from your first script to a system you build yourself.

Open the Coding Sheet

Frequently Asked Questions

A Type I report checks that your controls are designed correctly on one date. A Type II report checks that they worked throughout an observation period, usually 6 to 12 months. Enterprise customers usually ask for Type II, so start collecting evidence the day a control goes live.

No. They describe outcomes, such as restricting access or scanning for vulnerabilities, and you choose the tools. Tools like Trivy or Falco can provide the evidence, but no framework requires them by name.

It means expressing your rules as policies that run automatically, in the pipeline, in the cluster, and in the cloud account. Every run produces a log or report that doubles as audit evidence. You stop collecting screenshots before an audit.

Cordoning only stops new pods landing on a node. The compromised pod keeps running, and its ReplicaSet will recreate it if you delete it. You need to relabel the pod, isolate it with a network policy, collect evidence, and then delete it.